In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has reprimanded yoga guru Ramdev for his controversial remarks against Hamdard’s popular beverage Rooh Afza. Ramdev had accused the company of engaging in what he termed as “Sharbat Jihad”, a comment that the court deemed as indefensible. Hamdard’s legal representative condemned Ramdev’s statement, labeling it as hate speech aimed at fostering communal discord. During the court proceedings, Ramdev’s legal team pledged to take down any videos containing the contentious remarks. This incident transpired after Ramdev alleged that profits from the sale of Rooh Afza were being channeled to support madrasas and mosques, sparking a wave of backlash and legal action. The court’s rebuke comes amidst a backdrop of heightened sensitivity around issues of religious harmony and incitement of communal tensions in India. The case serves as a stark reminder of the need for responsible discourse and the potential consequences of inflammatory statements in a diverse and multicultural society like India. As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen how this episode will impact public perceptions and the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech and religious tolerance in the country.