In a recent court decision in India, a man has been sentenced to 20 years in jail for raping a 14-year-old girl, despite DNA evidence not matching the fetus. The verdict was handed down after a lengthy trial process that considered various pieces of evidence. The case has sparked debate among legal experts and the public about the interpretation of DNA evidence in criminal cases. The man was found guilty of raping the minor, leading to her pregnancy, despite the lack of a direct match between his DNA and the fetus. The court ultimately relied on other evidence presented during the trial to convict the man. This case highlights the complexities involved in using DNA evidence in criminal proceedings and the importance of considering all available evidence in such cases. The verdict sends a strong message about the seriousness of crimes against minors and the need for justice to be served. The decision has been widely covered in the media, drawing attention to the issue of sexual violence in India and the legal system’s response to such cases. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing efforts to address and prevent crimes against children in the country.