. The court’s remarks came in a case where the accused was acquitted of rape charges as the victim failed to prove that the sexual relationship was based only on the promise of marriage. The high court emphasized the need for clear and cogent evidence to establish that the accused had no intention of marrying the victim at the time of establishing the physical relationship. The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of scrutinizing the evidence in cases of rape under the pretext of marriage. It highlights the significance of understanding the nuances of consent and the intentions of both parties involved. The court’s decision underscores the need for victims to provide concrete proof of the accused’s dishonest intentions regarding marriage. This ruling is significant in the context of the ongoing discussions surrounding consent, particularly in cases where consent may have been obtained through deceit or false promises. It also sheds light on the complexities of navigating legal frameworks when addressing cases of sexual assault. The high court’s stance reinforces the need for a thorough examination of evidence to ensure justice is served in cases of rape under false pretences of marriage in India.