In a recent court case in India, a man has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for raping a 14-year-old girl, despite the DNA not matching the fetus. The incident has sparked outrage and raised concerns about the justice system. The accused was found guilty of raping the minor, but the DNA evidence did not link him to the fetus. The court, however, relied on other evidence and witness testimonies to convict the man. This case highlights the challenges in prosecuting sexual assault cases and the importance of a thorough investigation. The verdict has been met with mixed reactions, with some praising the court’s decision to convict the accused based on other evidence, while others question the validity of the conviction without DNA evidence. The case serves as a reminder of the need for a robust legal system that ensures justice for victims of sexual assault. It also underscores the significance of collecting and preserving evidence in such cases to secure convictions. The court’s ruling sends a strong message that perpetrators of sexual violence will be held accountable for their actions, even in the absence of DNA evidence. The case has reignited the debate on the effectiveness of the legal system in addressing crimes against women and children.