In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the verdict in a 40-year-old rape case, stating that proof of injury to the private parts is not necessary for a conviction. The case involves a tuition teacher convicted of sexually assaulting a schoolgirl in 1984, with the court highlighting that the victim’s testimony alone can be sufficient evidence for conviction. Dismissing the accused teacher’s claims regarding the victim’s mother, the court emphasized the autonomy of the rape case from the character of the victim or her family. This ruling sets a significant precedent in cases of sexual assault, reinforcing the importance of believing and valuing the testimony of victims. The decision underscores the need for a victim-centric approach in such cases, prioritizing justice and accountability. The Supreme Court’s judgment marks a crucial step towards ensuring justice for survivors of sexual violence and upholding the rule of law. This verdict is expected to have far-reaching implications for similar cases in the future, signaling a shift towards a more victim-friendly legal framework in India.