The Supreme Court judges in India recently found themselves in a perplexing situation when they got confused over the existence of a lawyer during a hearing. The incident occurred during a virtual court session, raising questions about the authenticity of the lawyer’s identity. The confusion arose when the lawyer, who was representing a client in a case, failed to respond to the judges’ queries. The judges then asked the lawyer to switch on his camera to verify his presence, but the lawyer claimed that his camera was not functioning. This led to a debate among the judges about whether the lawyer was indeed a real person or a fictitious entity. The incident highlights the challenges of conducting court proceedings virtually and the importance of ensuring the credibility of participants in such hearings. Virtual court sessions have become increasingly common in India due to the Covid-19 pandemic, but issues like this raise concerns about the reliability of the process. The Supreme Court judges eventually decided to adjourn the hearing and instructed the lawyer to appear in person in the next session to confirm his identity. This incident serves as a reminder of the need for robust verification processes in virtual court proceedings to maintain the integrity of the legal system.