In a significant development, the Supreme Court has reproached Tamil Nadu governor RN Ravi for his refusal to give assent to Bills approved by the state assembly. The apex court deemed the governor’s actions, such as holding back 10 Bills for the President’s consideration after they had already been reviewed, as both unlawful and against the constitution. Consequently, the court has upheld these Bills as officially passed, highlighting the importance of adherence to legal protocols and the constitutional framework. This decision marks a crucial moment in the realm of governance and legislative processes, emphasizing the need for upholding the rule of law. The court’s stance serves as a reminder of the delicate balance of power between different branches of government and the necessity of respecting the democratic procedures in place. The ruling provides clarity on the governor’s role in the legislative process and sets a precedent for future interactions between state assemblies and governors across the country. This development is likely to have far-reaching implications for the functioning of state governments and the interpretation of constitutional provisions. It underscores the significance of legal compliance and adherence to established norms in a democratic society.