Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin hailed the recent Supreme Court judgment against the state’s Governor as “historic.” The ruling came after the court declared that the Governor cannot interfere with the day-to-day affairs of the state government. The Chief Minister’s statement came in response to the verdict, emphasizing the significance of the decision in upholding the principles of democracy and federalism. The judgment is seen as a landmark moment in Indian politics, setting a precedent for the relationship between state governments and Governors. The Chief Minister’s praise for the ruling reflects the state government’s commitment to maintaining its autonomy and authority in governance. The Supreme Court’s decision has been widely welcomed by political leaders and experts across the country for its implications on the constitutional framework. This development is expected to have a lasting impact on the functioning of state administrations and the role of Governors in India. The Chief Minister’s remarks have drawn attention to the importance of upholding constitutional values and the rule of law in the country’s democratic system. The judgment is likely to influence future interactions between state governments and Governors, defining the boundaries of their respective powers. The historic nature of the verdict underscores the significance of the judiciary in safeguarding the democratic principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution.