The Supreme Court of Singapore has recently invalidated an arbitration award that was allegedly copied and pasted by former Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra. The decision was made after it was discovered that the award contained extensive portions that were identical to an earlier award issued by a different arbitrator. The court found that Misra, who served as the arbitrator in the case, had failed to disclose the similarities between the two awards, leading to questions about the integrity of the arbitration process. The ruling has raised concerns about the ethical standards of arbitrators and the need for greater transparency in arbitration proceedings. This development highlights the importance of upholding ethical practices in the legal profession and the consequences of failing to do so. The case has garnered significant attention in India and serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in legal proceedings. It also underscores the need for robust mechanisms to prevent unethical behavior and ensure accountability in the legal system. The Singapore Supreme Court’s decision sends a strong message about the consequences of ethical lapses in arbitration and the importance of upholding the rule of law.