Last week, the Nagpur bench of Bombay HC confirmed a 10-year rigorous imprisonment for a man convicted of raping a minor under the false pretense of marriage. Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke emphasized the invalidity of a minor’s consent and remarked that a false promise amounted to ‘misconception of fact.’ DNA evidence supported the minor’s claims, consolidating the prosecution’s case.

The High Court’s decision sends a strong message against sexual predators who exploit minors by making false promises. The ruling serves as a deterrent and upholds the principle that consent obtained through deceit is not valid, especially when it involves minors. This case highlights the importance of safeguarding vulnerable individuals from manipulation and abuse. It also underscores the significance of DNA evidence in corroborating the victim’s testimony and securing justice in such cases.

Last week, the Nagpur bench of Bombay HC confirmed a 10-year rigorous imprisonment for a man convicted of raping a minor under the false pretense of marriage. Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke emphasized the invalidity of a minor’s consent and remarked that a false promise amounted to ‘misconception of fact.’ DNA evidence supported the minor’s claims, consolidating the prosecution’s case.