to ensure gender equality and justice for all citizens. The court’s observation came during the hearing of a petition challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the UCC. The petitioners argued that the current provisions of the UCC discriminate against women and violate their fundamental rights. The court directed the state to file its response within four weeks and scheduled the next hearing for the first week of September.

The petitioners, a group of women’s rights activists, argued that certain provisions of the UCC are discriminatory towards women, particularly in matters of marriage, divorce, and inheritance. They contended that these provisions violate the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The petitioners urged the court to strike down these provisions and bring about necessary changes to ensure gender equality and justice for all citizens. The court’s decision to seek the state’s response indicates a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over the UCC.

The court’s decision to seek the state’s response on the matter reflects a growing recognition of the need for gender equality and justice in Indian society. The UCC has been a topic of contentious debate for many years, with proponents arguing that it is necessary to promote a common set of laws for all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs. However, critics have raised concerns that the current provisions of the UCC are biased against women and fail to protect their rights adequately. The court’s intervention in this matter signals a potential shift towards a more inclusive and equitable legal framework that upholds the rights of all citizens. It remains to be seen how the state will respond to the court’s directive and whether it will be willing to make the necessary changes to ensure gender equality and justice under the UCC.