. The court emphasized that “mere breach of a promise to marry cannot be a reason to turn a consensual relationship into rape.” This ruling came during a case where a man was accused of raping a woman on the false promise of marriage. The court highlighted the importance of scrutinizing the evidence to determine if the promise of marriage was a ‘misrepresentation of fact’. It stated that if the woman continued to engage in a physical relationship despite knowing the promise was false, it would not amount to rape. The judgment underscored the need for clear and unequivocal evidence to prove that the accused had no intention of marrying the victim at the time the promise was made. The court’s decision provides clarity on the legal aspect of consent in relationships where false promises of marriage are involved. It also serves as a reminder for individuals to be cautious and vigilant in such matters. The ruling is expected to have a significant impact on similar cases in the future, setting a precedent for the judicial treatment of rape cases under false marriage promises in India.