A man in India has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for raping a 14-year-old girl, despite DNA evidence not matching the fetus. The court’s decision highlights the challenges in prosecuting sexual assault cases and the importance of other evidence in securing convictions. The incident occurred in [location], where the man, [name], was accused of raping the minor. Despite the DNA test results not linking him to the fetus, the court found him guilty based on other evidence presented during the trial. This case sheds light on the complexities of rape investigations and the need for a comprehensive approach to gathering evidence. Sexual assault cases in India often face hurdles in the legal system, including delays in trials and challenges in collecting evidence. The verdict in this case sends a strong message about the importance of thorough investigations and the need to consider all available evidence. The victim’s testimony and other circumstantial evidence played a crucial role in securing the conviction. The court’s decision sets a precedent for future cases and underscores the importance of a victim-centered approach to handling sexual assault cases. This ruling is a step towards ensuring justice for survivors of sexual violence and holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.