The Supreme Court has barred the filing of a fresh FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin, the DMK youth wing secretary, over his remarks on Sanatana Dharma. The decision came after Stalin’s counsel argued that the remarks were made in the political context and did not amount to an offense. The court noted that freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. The case against Stalin was filed in Uttar Pradesh after a complaint was lodged by a lawyer over his comments during his election campaign in the state. The court’s ruling has been seen as a victory for freedom of speech in India. Stalin, who is also a popular actor in the Tamil film industry, has been vocal about his political opinions and has often criticized the ruling government. The case highlights the ongoing debate in India about the balance between freedom of speech and the right to not offend religious sentiments. This development is likely to have implications for future cases involving similar issues. The court’s decision is expected to set a precedent for how such matters are handled in the future. It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact political discourse and freedom of expression in the country.