In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India deliberated on a petition regarding the violence in West Bengal stemming from protests against the Waqf Amendment Act. Justice Gavai’s bench carefully considered the delicate balance of powers outlined in the Constitution to avoid overstepping boundaries. The court acknowledged concerns of encroachment on the domains of the Parliament and the executive branch. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the petitioner, urged the court to issue directives to the Centre under Article 355, proposing the imposition of President’s Rule in the state due to the ongoing unrest. The case has sparked discussions about the role of the judiciary in addressing political and social turmoil, while also highlighting the need for a nuanced approach to upholding constitutional principles. The hearing showcased the court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law while navigating complex political issues. This development underscores the significance of the judiciary in maintaining stability and justice in the face of civil unrest. Stay tuned for further updates on this evolving story as the Supreme Court continues to deliberate on this critical issue.