The Delhi High Court recently rebuked yoga guru Ramdev for his controversial remarks against Hamdard’s popular beverage Rooh Afza, accusing the company of engaging in what he termed as “Sharbat Jihad”. The court deemed Ramdev’s comments as indefensible, with Hamdard’s lawyer condemning them as hate speech and promoting communal division. Ramdev’s legal team assured the court that any related videos containing such statements would be taken down. This issue arose after Ramdev alleged that the profits from Rooh Afza were being used to finance madrasas and mosques, sparking outrage and prompting legal action. The court’s criticism of Ramdev’s statements sheds light on the growing concerns surrounding hate speech and religious intolerance in India. The controversy underscores the need for responsible public discourse and the importance of fostering harmony and understanding in a diverse society like India. The legal proceedings in this case serve as a reminder of the consequences of making inflammatory statements that can incite hatred and fuel communal tensions. As the matter continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the courts will address the implications of such divisive rhetoric and uphold the principles of unity and respect for all communities in the country.