The Supreme Court has intervened in the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi, challenging the Allahabad High Court’s decision to not dismiss the summons related to his comments on Veer Savarkar. The apex court warned Gandhi against making derogatory remarks about freedom fighters, especially Savarkar, who holds immense respect in Maharashtra. It highlighted the historical significance by mentioning a letter penned by Gandhi’s grandmother and former Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, lauding Savarkar. The court’s decision has stirred discussions on the importance of maintaining decorum while discussing national icons. Gandhi’s statements have sparked controversy and the legal battle continues as the case progresses through the judicial system. The Supreme Court’s intervention has brought attention to the need for responsible communication, particularly when discussing revered figures in Indian history. Savarkar’s legacy remains a contentious topic, with supporters and detractors debating his contributions to the country’s independence movement. As the case unfolds, the spotlight remains on Gandhi’s remarks and the implications they hold in the larger discourse on patriotism and historical narratives in India.